25 October 2026

Listening inside Plato's cave

 

Walang Mabanaag (Unable to Decipher) by Mesándel Virtusio Arguelles (University of the Philippines Press, 2026)

  

“Never mistranslate. Translation is sacred,” says a character in Bong Joon Ho’s film Okja (2017). In Walang Mabanaag, the latest offering from the prolific Filipino writer Mesándel Virtusio Arguelles, the poet-translator has committed an unpardonable sin in the practice of translation. He has mistranslated! Gasp!

Arguelles does not understand the Cebuano language and yet he decides to translate into Filipino the debut poetry collection by Jona Branzuela Bering, titled Alang sa Nasaag (Bathalad Inc., 2016). Instead of translating the meaning of the words, he decides to translate purely by sound. He bravely calls it a “mistranslation.” 

The sinner has readily confessed. So better keep your calm, members of the translation police force. Be gentle, gatekeepers of language. And be flexible, auditors of translation projects. You can let go of your checklist on translation faithfulness. The auditors will need to sharpen their auditory skills to evaluate the soundness of this translation.

The poet flexes his linguistic skills by using sound as the material for his undertaking. He set out to demonstrate, dare I say it, the right ear for translation. 

SABADO, ALAS-SAIS SA BITAG

 

Ang kuneho sa kuryente

Nalapnos sa biglang pusok

Ng ulan. Bawat patak matindi,

Ang kalsada luhaan

Sa nabuwang na langit. 

This is not a “bilingual” edition. We only have the Filipino version in front of us. Asked why he did not have the “translated” poem side by side with the Cebuano original in the book, the poet said he wanted to somehow distance the translation from the original, to recognize their separate artistic presences. The original counterpart looks (or sounds) like this:

SABADO, ALAS SAYIS SA BUNTAG

 

Ang kutay sa kuryente

Namabdos og daghang lusok

Sa uwan. Kada tagak niini,

Ang kalsada lubnganan

Sa nakuhaang langit

Cebuano and Filipino may be distinct languages, but the same vowels and consonants will carry the workload of the homophonic translator. Below is a translation attempt—a semantic take this time—on the Filipino, since this reader could not decipher Cebuano either. A homophonic English translation of either version will be a far more daunting task; English may be too catholic for this kind of linguistic transformation.

SATURDAY, SIXTH HOUR ON THE DOT

 

The rabbit in shock

Electrocuted by the power surge

Of rain. Excessive rainfall,

The streets weep

Beneath the crazed heaven. 

Noise! The poor fate of the rabbit is the result of sound effects. The poet, known previously for his erasure poetry, sonnet-deconstruction, and other innovative concepts, chooses this time to focus on the sense of hearing. 

In “Ang Pagsuko” (“Ang Pagtubo” in the original), the sound creates its own path out of the unwieldy brambles and branches of the original.

Wala akong talinghaga

sa paglingon. Bigo akong mapatitikom.

Sadyang sumusuko ang salita para maghilom.

 

Original Cebuano:

 

Wala baya ko mahingangha

sa iyang giingon. Igo ra kong mipahiyom.

Samang ang sabila motubo ra sa hilom.

 

Translation of Filipino:

 

I don’t harbor metaphors

about eternal return. I cannot be silenced.

The words surrender to heal.

The poet said it took him almost nine years to complete the task of mistranslation. Along the way, the labor must have been punctuated by ‘hearer’s block.’ As the poet tries to capture meanings out of pure sound, he is also constructing meaning in the target language to fill the pages with legible and intelligible jottings.

It is easy to fall prey to the poet’s mind games. The poet’s project seems to negate the entropy of sense: out of linguistic uncertainty and Cebuano-Filipino incompatibility, it generates new meanings. This is a kind of negentropy (negative entropy)—not a transposition of the original’s meanings, but the creation of new ones through their disruption. Here is how “Lagom” (Summation, “Dagom” in the original Cebuano) ends:

At ang luhang nakapalayo

na sa pangingilid sa itinakdang mga mata.

May isang kathang walang batas

at itinakdang kagalakan ng anti-kanon.

At ang mga saksi ay hindi na

muling makalilingon.

 

Original:

 

O ang duha nakahibawo

na nga motipig sa gagmayng mga butang.

O di ba kaha, wan-ay tastas

nga angayng kabalak-an ug atimanon.

Ug ang mga gisi di na angayng

panumbalingon karon.

 

Translation of Filipino:

 

And the tears run away

from welling up in their designated eyes.

A literary work doesn’t follow all the rules

and is the toast of the anti-canon.

And the witnesses shall

no longer look back.

In the same anti-canon spirit of the work, the reader squints his eyes even if he can’t see. He marvels at the creative gumption of a poet filling in the blanks, inserting his political commentary and literary intents into innocent words and punctuation marks.

The poem “Dyslexia” probably carries meaning further into terra incognita. Here is the entire poem:

Bugtong!

Ligalig ka sa iyong salita,

ay, kanino ba, natisod

sa pagbasa sa binuod

na istorya.

 

Nilumot na sa pagbasa

sa inog ng pagbuklat

ng mga mata,

na namimilog:

haraya, haraya.

 

Original:

 

Uy, Dong!

Tingalig naa ka ining sakita,

kay, unsa ba, maglisod

man kag basa sa tinuod

nga estorya.

 

Samot na sa pagbasa

sa tingog sa budlat

nakong mata,

nga naglanog:

ikaw ra, ikaw ra.

 

Translation of Filipino:

 

Riddle!

Your words are in turmoil,

ay, for whose eyes, you stumble

while reading

Cliff’s Notes.

 

Grown barnacles from reading

the cycle of pages the eyes

flip through,

the eyes popped out:

wanted: metaphor.

The invisible process of hearing becomes the work’s subject as much as its final product. The translator deliberately mangles and destroys the original poetry to create a new disharmony of music.

I would like to interview Bering, the author of the source book, to find out what she thinks of this translation project. As a concept, the whole idea of homophonic translation fascinates me. On paper, I mean on the page, the renditions are a riot of comic possibilities.

Meanings are posthumous. I cannot explain why I could not contain my laughter while reading every other poem in this book. It is the same experience I had reading Chi for the first time, the middle collection of Arguelles's Three Books (Broken Sleep Books, 2020), as translated by Kristine Ong Muslim. Chi is an erasure of Say ni Chiz (ICatcher Productions, Inc., 2009), a memoir by Chiz Escudero. 

Like Chi, Walang Mabanaag makes its own process of construction visible, transforming material from an existing work into something new while leaving traces of the source behind. But where Chi erases and reconfigures a memoir, Walang Mabanaag remakes poetry through sound, generating new meanings from the distance between the Cebuano source text and its radical Filipino transformation.

Who can begrudge our translator for opting to remain faithful to one aspect of the source text that he does not speak? As Damion Searls wrote in The Philosophy of Translation (2024): “In judging a translation, then, the ideal of ‘faithfulness’ is an empty tautology: we are really judging what the translator sees in the author or text and chooses to be faithful to.” Thus, the translator simply earmarked certain passages for his own hearing. 

This volume shows that it is sometimes productive to be in the dark, allowing meanings to serendipitously find their way to you, rather than actively seeking them out. The full weight of existence is hard to bear when data and information bombard you left and right. We need air and airy language to let go of the burden of communication.

This opening stanza from the title poem, “Walang Mabanaag” (Unable to Decipher, “Alang sa Nasaag” in the original), is illuminating, in a manner of speaking:

Nang nakita kita sa daan tungong aplaya,

sinarhan ko na ang lumang bintana

at nag-uwian ang naghuhuntahan. Umalingaw.

Naumid ang baybayin, lumipad

ang mga kabág sa mga tumana:

Nabanaag ba riyan ang anino?

Kaninong anino ang anino sa banaag?

 

Original:

 

Samtang nangita kas da’n padu’ng sa atoa,

trangkahan nako ang tanang bentana

ug ablihan ang purtahan. Ug molakaw.

Mamidpid kos baybayon, manimpa’d

nga matubag ang mga pangutana:

Masaag pa diay ang suheto?

Unsa kasuheto ang suheto sa pagkasaag?

 

Translation of Filipino:

 

When I saw you on the way to the beach,

I hurriedly closed the old windows

and the gossips went home. A shout.

The coastline receded in shame, the anxiety

was exorcised from the fields:

Has the shadow been detected?

Whose shadow is the shadow in silhouette?

In Walang Mabanaag (Unable to Decipher), Arguelles has robbed us of the sense of sight. All we see are shadows of words with shadowy meanings, trying to escape, but unable to do so, from the constraint of sound and the endless possibilities of humor and wit. 

Rather than delivering us from the darkness, the poet deliberately put us right back inside Plato’s cave. It is not always the light that brings illumination and insight. Sometimes, understanding requires not illumination but a willingness to remain in the dark and listen. Ssshhh! Listen. Ssshhh! 



10 October 2026

The burden of understanding


a different body by Lean Borlongan, translated by Eric Abalajon (self-published, 2025)

 

If only he could stop
the involuntary movements
of his hands
always shaking
left and right, if only
his tongue and lips were not twisted
if only his head
hadn't filled with fluid
if only he were born full-term
he would not
write poetry
about failed loves.

["The Poet"]

 

By page 30 of this collection, one reads a college application form in which the applicant (the poet) is asked if he has a disability (Yes / No). The applicant puts a check beside No. With that simple lie, the reader can sense a personal world shifting in its course.

Here is a poetry collection that does not announce its difference lightly. It tackles the themes of inclusivity and disability in a manner that suspends and redraws our assumptions about inclusivity and disability. One reads and recognizes the truths behind the lines, the hurt and pain that must have accompanied their writing.

The title of the collection was taken from "Tonight," in which the disabled poet imagined himself in the body of another, "longing / desiring to live / in a different body?" To be different can be a curse, but the poet chose to express his longings and desires to give shape to his singularity.

The whole sequence was capped with "Until Believed," a powerful ending that is as close to a manifesto or poetics as there can ever be about disability. It began with the circumstances and limitations faced by a person with disability "in a society / where a broken body / is nothing special":

To be disabled
is to be mocked
to be shouted at
in the streets
pelted with insults
reprimanded by the guard
refused at restaurants
denied purchase
barred entrance
locked out. 

Each stanza began with the same line: "To be disabled" ("Ang kapansanan"). It was almost like a repeated line in a famous poem, "The guerrilla is like a poet," but here a narrative was being limned, its arc moving from physical limitation to defeat and eventually to resistance. 

As the poet found his voice, he came to terms with his physical self and his literary abilities. The poet as a PWD was also a survivor and resistance fighter.

To be disabled
is to defy limits
and boundaries
to continue fighting
even when the heart and mind
are bruised.

To be disabled
is to dare
to challenge everyone
to question their own beliefs
and to change the order of things.

To be disabled 
is just a part of me.
Not the whole of me. 

And therein lies the poet's mastery of himself. His physical condition does not wholly define him, as he is much more than this. He was not another acronym or a broken body. In this collection, his body may be the site of his poetry, but his poetry shines through to illuminate the fullness of his humanity.

The poet's actual medical records—detailing the results of his medical procedures and diagnoses—were interspersed with the poems in this bilingual edition. These documents authenticate and blur how we receive these lines. The objective value of these unfeeling, scientific documents stands in contrast to the subjective feelings of personal poetry. 

In lines of poetry "lie emotions / that can't be shown openly / ... / lie my passion / my sincerity / my true voice" [from "In Poetry"]. The poet gave voice to none other than himself. 

We were privy to a very personal journey as the poems contextualized an experience that was not only lived but relived.

A tilted, swaying head
is mocked for always being
drunk. I drank and drank –
no matter how bitter
no matter how I sank
I will wake up to my own affliction. 

[from "Drunk"] 

The poet woke up daily to his own affliction. And daily, he came face to face with people's presumptions and assumptions about what he could and could not do. In "People," the poet turned the tables on the able-bodied citizens who had misunderstood him for most of his life.

Though they are unaware 
of their prejudice
I am consciously judging.
These sons of bitches
look like idiots.
I am smarter than them. 

The poet then shifted the "burden of understanding" his condition from himself to the other people, focusing instead on his understanding of their misunderstanding. 

Yet still, I bear
the burden 
of understanding.
They only wish
to get their message across.

The disabled poet's empathy for the non-disabled flipped the perspective. The poet has demonstrated a generosity of another order.

In the body of the poem
the veins don't fidget.
Lips have a voice that is
ready to share secrets
and depth. ...
.......................................
I am conversing
with readers
even only for a moment
with an abled body.

[from "In Poetry II"]

He has put himself in the shoes of others. He has glimpsed his condition from the perspective of others and has decided to express what he found in his poems.

In a different body, an individual has found his profession in poetry. His declaration was unequivocal: here I am in all my profound humanity. This is a book that overcame the odds. Its translator, Eric Abalajon, has made creative decisions that negotiate the idiomatic uses and quirks of the Filipino language. It would require deep sensitivity on the part of the translator to convey Borlongan's poetry. I believe that this is Abalajon's first published book of translation. For both poet and translator, this bilingual edition was a moving meditation on disability and humanity.