06 September 2010

Visiones de Marías


Bad Nature, or With Elvis in Mexico is the latest book I've read and I'm still constructing my thoughts about it. It's a bad bad book, and I mean that in the wild wild west sense. I read it ahead of the other books I bought in my recent book-hunting in Manila, a rare opportunity to stock my shelf with goodies. I decided to read it for its sheer brevity in length, a mere 57 pages of Marías-concentrate, in one of the beautifully spare designs of New Directions Pearls. I also bought The Literary Conference by César Aira, a writer I've only started reading this year, an instant favorite with his surreal Ghosts and the lighted landscapes of An Episode in the Life of a Landscape Painter. My other purchases are Clandestine in Chile by Gabriel García Márquez, Six Records of a Floating Life by Shen Fu, Pedro Páramo by Juan Rulfo. I was also very fortunate to come across a used copy of "AN ADVANCED READING COPY FROM UNCORRECTED PROOFS" of The Seventh Samurai by Helen DeWitt. Its final published title would be The Last Samurai (no, not the). The reference is to Akira Kurosawa's celebrated movie. I've started reading a few pages of DeWitt and ... BIG WOW. This is the Fall book selection of Conversational Reading. Oh and I also got the bad bad (I really meant this in a bad way) The Body Artist by Don DeLillo. I only picked it up to go with the DeWitt book for the buy-one-take-one promo in the used book store.

I'm still thinking a lot about the ending of Bad Nature. It is tearing me apart. And the frequent references to "dark back" (as in, Dark Back of Time) had me in stitches. The book is about a translator/interpreter who worked for Elvis Presley in a movie set in Acapulco, Mexico. In one of their bar hops, one of the guys in Elvis's contingent offended a Mexican gangster. Inevitably, Elvis and his companions became embroiled in an argument with the gangster's group. The translator is the only person who could communicate the insults shuttling back and forth between the two factions. As is usual with Marias, the currents of terror are at first gliding innocently on the surface of the story and then breaks to the surface to take over the story. As I understand it from this story: the bad nature resides in all of us. The gangsters and also Elvis can be bad, as in evil, anytime. The key to world peace is tolerating "the other" but this is impossible because there is always a barrier of communication. Language and the significations of language can get the better of people. If we can not get past our own linguistic (i.e., cultural) prejudices then we are at a permanent state of conflict. Even gestures, like language, can be fatal. (The key scene in Bad Nature reminds me of a disturbing story, told as a joke, in Roberto Bolaño's 2666 where a simple handshake between a French scientist and an indigenous tribesman in Borneo, a pat on the shoulder, and an intent look in the eyes were all misconstrued by the native as an act of violence or rape or the eating of soul.)

At the back of the book With Elvis in Mexico (why not use the alternate title alone? Sometimes I'd like to refer to McCarthy's meridional bloodbath as The Evening Redness in the West. In some ways, the Elvis and the Redness books share a theme, but I'm not stretching it.), at the back of this short story (really too short to be called a novella) is a sketch (shown below) by Marías. They have one for each of the authors in the Pearls edition. Below the sketch is the blurb "Admired by Bolaño, Ashbery, Sebald, Pamuk, and Coetzee." In a paperback copy of the earlier published Fever and Spear, the back cover blurb only mentions "Pahmuk [sic], Coetzee, and Sebald." Bolaño is a late addition to the roster of Marías admirers but he was really an avid reader of the Spanish writer from early on.


JAVIER MARÍAS

Javier Marías is already internationally renowned as many of his books were translated in several languages and were awarded prestigious literary prizes (in original and translations). His books also sold already in the millions. Born in 1951, Marías is one of the leading contemporary writers in Spain. He is a novelist, short story writer, essayist, newspaper columnist, and translator. He published his first novel at age 19, finished his degree of Philosophy and Letters at Universidad Complutense de Madrid, and taught in Spain, UK (Oxford University) and the United States. Among the writers he translated into Spanish are Conrad, Hardy, Faulkner, Nabokov, Thomas Browne, Sterne, Shakespeare, Yeats, Auden, and Wallace Stevens. At present he reigns as the King of Redonda, an island in the Caribbean.


TRANSLATED BOOKS

Marías is a prolific writer. He has over 30 titles to his name. About a dozen of his books were available in English so far. Everything was translated by Margaret Jull Costa save for Dark Back of Time and Bad Nature (both translated by Esther Allen) and Voyage Along the Horizon (by Kristina Cordero). Some of his nonfiction pieces appeared in The New Republic, Granta, The New York Times, The Believer, and The Threepenny Review.


NOVELS

Voyage Along the Horizon
The Man of Feeling
All Souls
A Heart So White
Tomorrow in the Battle Think on Me
Your Face Tomorrow [in 3 volumes - Fever and Spear; Dance and Dream; Poison, Shadow and Farewell]


FALSE NOVEL

Dark Back of Time [a "false" sequel to All Souls]


SHORT STORIES

When I Was Mortal [one story "Fewer Scruples" is online at The Barcelona Review]
While the Women Are Sleeping [forthcoming this year, the title story is at the New Yorker]


NONFICTION

Written Lives


SINGLE-STORY BOOKS

Bad Nature, or With Elvis in Mexico
Gualta [this story of fantasy can be read online, only if your eyes permit it]
While the Women Are Sleeping


MARÍAS & BOLAÑO

It's not hard to see why the writer is admired by great contemporary writers such as Bolaño and Sebald. He is a great one himself. Bolaño was impressed by Marías's early books, books that have yet to appear in English. He praised Los dominios de lobo (1971) ("The Dominions of the Wolf"), the very first novel Marías wrote at age 18 and published a year later. For Bolaño, this book (along with La asesina ilustrada by Vila-Matas) "marked a point of departure for our generation." In his essay "Advice on the Art of Writing Short Stories" Bolaño listed a handful of "highly recommended books and authors", among them Marías’s story collection Mientras ellas duermen (Editorial Anagrama, Barcelona, 1990). The English translation of this book, While the Women Are Sleeping, is forthcoming from New Directions in November. Bolaño admitted to having been influenced by Marías. He once spoke to the journalist Sergio González Rodríguez whom he consulted in the writing of his final unfinished novel. The critic Marcela Valdes wrote about it in her review in The New Republic: "Listen, Bolaño joked, I'm going to make you [Sergio González Rodríguez] a character in my novel [2666]. I'm going to plagiarize the idea from Javier Marías, who made you a character in La negra espalda del tiempo [sic] [Dark Back of Time]." The plagiarizing of a great writer by another great one is not surprising. The "secret" connectivity in the body of work of Marías is comparable to the expanding universe of the Bolaño oeuvre.

I’m not sure how Marías himself view the Chilean writer’s works. But there's no question that Bolaño belongs to the fandom of Marías. In a 1999 interview for Capital (collected in Roberto Bolaño: The Last Interview), Héctor Soto and Matías Bravo asked the writer: "Between Latin America and Spanish writers, where is your literary brotherhood?" Bolaño replied at length, the perfect blurb really:

Basically among the Latin Americans—but also among the Spaniards. I don't believe in the separation of Latin American and Spanish writers. We all inhabit the same language. At least I think I cross those frontiers. And in my generation there is a mixed nucleus of writers, Spaniards and Latin Americans, the same way they were mixed in another era of Modernism, possibly the most revolutionary movement in Spanish literature of this century. Because of his strength, I think someone like Javier Marías is forced to influence Latin American literature, and he does. He is a great writer. By the same token, young Spanish writers should be influenced by someone like Rodrigo Rey Rosa or Juan Villoro, two enormous writers. I am extraordinarily blessed by a photograph of all of us together, from this and that side of the Atlantic. Rey Rosa, Villoro, Marías, Vila-Matas, Belén Gopegui, Victoria de Stefano.

Now where is that photograph?


MARÍAS & SEBALD

Max Sebald was known to personally admire the books of Marías. As king of the Island of Redonda, Marías instituted a prize where artists (authors, filmmakers, etc.) were given a title in his kingdom. The winners are selected by current reigning dukes and duchesses. Sebald was given the title "Duke of Vertigo." The other "royal appointments" include, among many others, Francis Ford Coppola (Duke of Megalopolis), Pedro Almodóvar (Duke of Trémula), A. S. Byatt (Duchess of Morpho Eugenia), William Boyd (Duke of Brazzaville), and Guillermo Cabrera Infante (Duke of Tigres). In his own work in the posthumous Unrecounted, Max also used a picture of Marías's eyes, one of the several pictures of "visions" in his books. He was also known to indorse the works of the Marías. The themes and prose styles of the writers are comparable to some extent. They are two writers whose whose writing projects are conceived with a view to the totality of their works. Their emblematic images persist in their books which often cross-reference each other. Like Sebald, Marías produced "picture books" where the subtexts of images seem to speak to the reader as much as the text itself. The picture books of Marías are essentially the unofficial "Deza trilogy": All Souls, a roman à clef semi-autobiographical novel and a comedy of the High Table; Dark Back of Time, a "false novel" which dissects the previous one; and Your Face Tomorrow, a novel about espionage and betrayal. (See also the Vertigo blog.)

The nonfiction Written Lives, a collection of biographic entries on literary writers, also contains portraits of writers. In this book, Marías literally became a "writer’s writer." Here he sketched some famous and obscure literary lives, in snippets or vignettes, not really in objective fashion, highlighting certain aspects of the writers' personalities, shattering some myths about them, perpetuating others. I think that the vignette form afforded Marías a perfect exercise in the selection of details. Out of so many facets of a writer's life, he has chosen the details that freeze the writer into a striking relief. This high selectivity of details is also comparable to the "nonfictional" novels of Sebald (as in the quartets of eccentric-melancholic personages in The Emigrants and Vertigo and in the moon-like fragments of The Rings of Saturn). It is also interesting to compare Bolaño's "political" creations of unorthodox writers in Nazi Literature in the Americas with Marías's mini-bios of real "political" writers in Written Lives.

02 September 2010

Half a Don Q



I'm halfway through the antics of Don Quixote. This spine-cracking reading is once again part of  the readalong over at Winstonsdad's Blog by Stu, who I want to thank here as I just won a book giveaway from him! Gracias, Stu!

I'm still catching on. It's Week 6 and I'm supposed to cover up to page 600 (I'm reading a hundred pages a week in my Penguin edition/Rutherford translation). As if reading my mind, Stu just declared a cease-read; the reprieve is to last for another week. However, I have an unexpected travel to Manila and so I'm still stuck at the end of Part I (page 479). I still hope to make some progress over the weekend.

The first part of this prancing, entrancing novel ended with more extravagant exuberant excursuses (say that word 20 times) for our ingenious knight. Not least of our hidalgo's glorious adventures is his own caging, like an animal. Talk about irreparable book-madness. Despite his involuntary confinement, it's quite heroic how Don Q still retained his errant spirit. He's still in fighting form against all the elements that conspire to defeat him. It seems like the whole of first part, not only those curious events set in the castle, is enchanting and enchanted.

I found another article on the translations of this "sloppiest" of masterpieces: "Don of a new era" by Ian Garrick Mason. After four centuries, the new era is still smirking in delight.

27 August 2010

The first Duino elegy (in Filipino)


Unang Elehiya
ni Rainer Maria Rilke


Sino, sa aking pagtangis, ang makikinig mula sa orden
ng mga anghel? Maski ang isa sa kanila’y dagli akong itutop
sa kanyang dibdib: Ako’y titiklop sa tanang kapangahasan.
Isa itong kariktang di maitawid sa kagampan. Ito’y simula ng katakutan
na ating sasambahin pagkat tayo’y kanyang lilipulin.
Nakagigimbal ang arkanghel.
Kagyat ako’y nagtimpi at tinikom ang hikbing awit ng
pagsinta. Ah, sino pa ang malalapitan?
Ni tao, ni anghel ay hindi, maging ang hayop na maalam ay dama
na hindi tayo kailanman magiging palagay
dito sa ating kinalakhang mundo. Marahil ang maiiwan na lamang
ay ilang puno sa parang, na siyang dudungawin ng ating
paningin. Marahil ang lakarin kahapon
at ang kinagisnang ugali na panatag na sa atin,
mananatiling tapat at di maiisipang mawalay.
Ah, ang gabi: naririyan sya, may taglay na hanging puspos
ng kawalang hangganan, kumukurot sa ating mukha.
Sinong makatatanggi sa kanya, habang tayo’y
nahihimlay sa kalmada na pinakaaasam
ng nagtatagong damdamin. Ganuon ba
kadali para sa magkaniig? Minarapat nilang magkubli
sa sumamo ng bawat isa. Hindi mo pa ba nalaman?
Iwaksi ang kawalan sa pagdipa ng iyong mga kamay,
patungo sa bawat pagitan ng hininga, nang makamit ng mga ibon
ang bugso ng hangin at lukso ng paglipad.

Oo, ang tagsibol ay nangailangan sa yo. Minsan
may talang dinarasal ang iyong pagtangì; may daluyong
nagmula sa nakalipas, humampas patungo sa iyo;
may biyoling ipinaubaya ang kanyang sarili,
sa pagtapat mo sa harap ng bintana. Ang lahat
ay tinakda. Mamarapatin mo bang tahakin ito?
Manapat ika’y di mapakali sa pag-asam,
na tila sinadyang dumating ng pinakamamahal?
(Saan mo kaya siya maisisilid, kasama
ng makabagong ideya, labas masok at magdamag
naglalaro sa iyong isip?)
Sa sandaling mangulila, awitan mo ang silakbo ng pag-ibig;
pagkat kapusukan nila'y kulang pa sa walang katapusan.
Halos nanibugho ka sa kanila, silang mga nalihis,
silang umibig nang higit sa busog na pag-ibig.
Paulit-ulit na pupunan ang papuring walang kinahinatnan.
Tandaan: ang bayani ay nabubuhay. Ang kanyang pagbagsak
ay daan lamang patungo sa huling pagsilang.
Ang kalikasan naman, kapos at muling aanyaya ng manliligaw,
na tila walang lakas para lumalang ng mga
bagong sugo. Pinag-isipan mo ba ng husto
itong si Gaspara Stampa, nang sa gayon, ang dalagang iniwan
ng kanyang mahal ay mabubuhay sa darang ng isa pang
pag-ibig, habang sa sarili ay sasambit, “Kailan ako magiging ikaw?”
Ang matagal nang dalamhati ay hindi ba dapat
pakinabangan na natin? Di ba’t oras na para pakawalan
ang ating mga sarili sa tanikala ng puso at pagtitiis,
ito’y nanginginig, katulad ng palasong tinitikis ang batak ng búsog
upang sa sandaling paalpasan, ito’y hihigit pa sa
sarili? Marahil wala na tayong patutunguhan.

Tinig, mga tinig. Makinig ka aking puso, gaya ng mga
banal na taimtim nakapakinig: hanggang sa ang tambuli
ay magpalutang sa kanila; kahit binalewala nila, nagpatuloy
silang lumuhod, ang mga wala nang pag-asa:
nakinig nang buong-buo. Hindi nangangahulugang malalampasan
mo ang boses ng Dyos—malabo ito.
Pakinggan mo ang boses ng hangin, ang mensaheng isinahugis
ng katahimikan. Mula sa mga kabataang nasawi,
ito’y bumubulong papalapit sa iyo. Tuwing sasamba ka sa katedral
ng Roma o Napoli, hindi ba marahang nakikiusap
sa iyo ang kanilang mga tadhana?
O kaya nama’y isang elehiya ang iniatas sa iyo
kagaya nung isang taon, nakaukit sa lapida ng Santa Maria Formosa.
Ang tulong na ipagkakaloob ko sa kanila, ang paghuhugas
sa di makatarungan nilang pagkamatay—magkaminsa’y
pumipigil sumandali sa pag-akyat ng kanilang espiritu.

Talagang kaiba kung wala nang tatao sa mundo
na susunod sa mga kinagisnang di madaling natutunan,
na pipitas sa rosas at mga bagay patungkol sa manigong
kinabukasan, na hihilig gaya ng dati sa malilikot na kamay, at sadyang
kalilimutan ang ibinansag na ngalan, tulad ng
pag-iwan sa laruang di na umaandar.
Kaiba kung hindi na papangarapin ang pangarap. Kaibang
mamalas ang mga bagay na dating pinagbuklod, ngayo’y
nagkawatak-watak sa lahat ng dako ng daigdig. Mahirap mamatay,
madaming pagkakaabalahan bago matamasa ang kakaunting
walang hanggan.—Kahit ang mga nabubuhay, mali
ang pakiwari sa talim ng tama at mali.
Malimit (anila) di matanto ng mga anghel kung sila’y nasa piling
ng mga patay o buhay. Saan mang hantungan,
walang humpay, tinatangay ng buhawi ang nagdaraang
panahon, at kinukulong ang kanyang hikbi sa gitna ng dagundong.

Sa katapusan, wala na tayong silbi sa mga pumanaw:
namulat sila ng mga bagay na makamundo, tulad ng unti-unting
pagkawalay sa gatas ng ina. Habang tayong may pangangailangan pa
sa malalalim na misteryo, tayo na kumukuha ng matinding
lakas sa dalita, kaya na ba nating wala sila?
Wala na bang saysay ang alamat na naitala kung saan,
sa matinding hapis kay Linos, ang maigting na pagkamanhid ay tinulos
ng mapangahas na pasok ng tugtog—biglang tumayo at lumakad papalayo
ang binatang matipuno; mula sa nagitlang espasyong iniwan nya,
sa unang pagkakataon, ang kumpas ng kawalan
ay sumasaatin: pumapatnubay, nakikiramay, at nakikiisa.



(salin mula sa Ingles ni Stephen Mitchell at ni William H. Gass)

"Against the Irreversible" (W. G. Sebald)


When he crossed the border into exile in Belgium, and had to take on himself the Jewish quality of homelessness, of being elsewhere, être ailleurs, he did not yet know how hard it would be to endure the tension between his native land as it became ever more foreign and the land of his foreign exile as it became ever more familiar. Seen in this light, Améry's suicide in Salzburg resolved the insoluble conflict between being both at home and in exile, "entre le foyer et le lontain."
                         - W. G. Sebald, On the Natural History of Destruction


Sebald's claim of the inadequacy of postwar German literature extended not only to the subject of destruction from air bombings but to the entire postwar experience. For him, the literary world then was characterized by a "huge moral deficit" that was gradually being addressed by a handful of writers slowly emerging from their labyrinths of silence. One of these writers was Jean Améry (1912-1978), the subject of Sebald's third essay in On the Natural History of Destruction. Améry started late into writing about his personal experiences of the war. He entered the literary debate in the 1960s when his essays on "exile, resistance, torture, and genocide" appeared. He wrote from the perspective of the victim, which is to say "the guilty one," guilty for being tortured and silenced and for having the memory to remember it all. Sebald's analysis of Améry's works often relied on role-playing and on the findings of William Niederland, a psychoanalyst. Sebald detected in Améry the "anguish of memory which is partly vague, partly full of a still acute fear of death." One could detect in Sebald's essay sympathy for a writer trying to come to terms with his own failure to memorialize (rationalize) what happened to him in the torture chamber. The attempt to articulate unspeakable emotions through language, Sebald observed, possibly led Améry to adopt the genre of essay in order to embrace the freedom of exposition. This was perhaps the only freedom one can enjoy when expressing the pain of suffering. Sebald quoted a passage of Améry's that exemplified the strategy of understatement (and irony) that the writer used to avoid "pity and self-pity." (Niederland found such avoidance to be typical of the accounts of torture victims.) Because the reconstruction of memory required a set of language which can dislocate the shoulders, the passage had to end in linguistic perversity: "... I had to give up rather quickly. And now there was a cracking and splintering in my shoulders that my body has not forgotten to this hour. The balls sprang from their sockets. My own body weight caused luxation; I fell into a void and now hung by my dislocated arms which had been torn high from behind and were now twisted over my head. Torture, from Latin torquere, to twist. What visual instruction in etymology!" This passage Sebald saw as reaching the breaking point of composure, as consciously "operating on the borders of what language can convey." When writing about the physicality of pain, the writer had to become the torturer himself. Torture has "an indelible character," Sebald quoted Améry: "Whoever was tortured, stays tortured." Whoever was killed in spirit, died ever after. And the long delayed terminus was never slow in coming. After writing the essays, which include At the Mind's Limits (1966) and On Suicide (1976), Améry's voluntary death was no twist of fate.

23 August 2010

Rilke



Who, if I cried out, would hear me among the angels'
hierarchies? and even if one of them pressed me
suddenly against his heart: I would be consumed
in that overwhelming existence. For beauty is nothing
but the beginning of terror, which we still are just able to endure,
and we are so awed because it serenely disdains
to annihilate us. Every angel is terrifying.

                                                         - from the Duino Elegies (1923),
                                                           Rainer Maria Rilke,
                                                           translation by Stephen Mitchell
 


The opening of Rilke's classic sequence of elegies. Beautiful, isn't it? Beautiful and scary at the same time.

I recently acquired a book called Reading Rilke: Reflections on the Problems of Translation by William H. Gass. It's classified as both biography and autobiography, an interesting combination. The subtitle alone makes me excited. And it's about translating poetry, one of my interests. A browse of the table of contents will give you some mysterious titles for chapters. They already sound like lines of a poem:
 
Lifeleading
Transreading
Ein Gott Vermags
Inhalation in a God
Schade
The Grace of Great Things
Erect No Memorial Stone
The Duino Elegies of Rainer Maria Rilke

The final chapter, Gass's full translation of Duino Elegies, is the cherry topping. Add to that the translations of some of Rilke's other poems scattered throughout the text, then I can't wait to down the pages of this book.

Gass's translation first came out in 1999; Mitchell's in 1982. In Gass's bibliography a list of 16 more translations of the same poem are given. This German poem surely resists the many rewordings of it, but it also survives miraculously in these interpretations.

A look at the end of Reading Rilke gives the same lines but with a different flavor:

Who, if I cried, would hear me among the Dominions
of Angels? And even if one of them suddenly
held me against his heart, I would fade in the grip
of that completer existence—a beauty we can barely
endure, because it is nothing but terror's herald;
and we worship it so because it serenely disdains
to destroy us. Every Angel is awesome.

I would certainly prefer an awesome Angel over a terrifying one. But not in this poem. "Terrifying" is simply a better choice and this poem ought to be that, terrifying. The poem inhabits various states of terror and tenderness and confusion. There is a searching edge to the voice. Mitchell's version reads well in terms of the forward movement of the lines and the rhythmic elegance of despair.

I am attempting a translation of "The First Elegy" into Filipino, my vernacular language. As my German is nil, I will use the English texts of both Mitchell and Gass. It will thus be a translation of translations. The inaccessibility of German to me is the main reason why I will be translating more the sense of the poem (from English), rather than the words.

I hope to be able to post my own version before the end of the month. August coincides with the Buwan ng Wika, or the National Language Month, in the Philippines. This exercise then will be my way of celebrating the Filipino language. I shall start like this:

Sino, sa aking pagtangis, ang makikinig mula sa orden
ng mga anghel? ...